Technical SEO Is the Foundation
Everything else, content, authority, and GEO included, depends on a technically sound site. If search engines can't crawl, index, and understand your pages efficiently, nothing else matters.
What We Audit
50+ factors across indexation, crawl efficiency, Core Web Vitals, schema markup, mobile optimization, site architecture, and more.
- ✓ Indexation and crawl efficiency
- ✓ Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS)
- ✓ Schema markup depth (Organization, Article, FAQ, Product, Person, BreadcrumbList)
- ✓ Mobile optimization
- ✓ Site architecture and internal linking
- ✓ Canonical tags and duplicate content
- ✓ XML sitemap health
- ✓ Robots.txt configuration
- ✓ HTTPS and security headers
- ✓ Page speed and resource optimization
Continuous, Not Quarterly
Technical health degrades constantly as sites ship features and update content. We monitor continuously and flag issues within hours, not in monthly reports. A canonical tag error that wipes 500 indexed pages gets caught the day it happens.
What’s Included
- ✓ Initial 50+ factor audit with scored report
- ✓ Continuous monitoring
- ✓ Core Web Vitals tracking
- ✓ Schema markup implementation recommendations
- ✓ Crawl budget optimization
- ✓ Monthly technical health reports
- ✓ Priority issue alerting
Who This Is For
Every business with a website needs technical SEO. Especially critical for: large ecommerce sites (10,000+ pages), SaaS companies shipping frequently, sites with complex JavaScript rendering, businesses that have undergone migrations or redesigns.
Ready to get started?
See what we find in your free audit, then decide if it makes sense to work together.
Anonymized Engagement
Ecommerce catalog at 220,000 SKUs, crawl-efficiency rebuild recovers 38% of deindexed pages in 9 weeks
Client profile, a DTC brand operating a multi-region ecommerce site with a 220,000-SKU catalog.
Problem
A platform migration left 84,000 product pages with canonical conflicts, intermittent JavaScript rendering failures, and a crawl budget exhausted on parameterized URLs. Google had deindexed roughly 18% of the catalog and revenue from organic was down 31% year over year.
Approach
Continuous-monitoring agent stood up on Day 1 covering indexation, Core Web Vitals, canonical health, schema correctness, and crawl budget. Canonical conflicts mapped and resolved in two sprints. Faceted-navigation parameter rules rebuilt. Server-rendered fallback added for the JavaScript-rendered pages that were intermittently invisible to Googlebot.
Outcome
Indexation recovered to 96% of catalog by week 9. Crawl budget freed up 34% for new SKU launches. Internal benchmark across comparable enterprise ecommerce technical recoveries.
Numbers reflect internal benchmark across comparable engagements, not a single named account.
How We Deliver
The five-step engagement model
-
1
50-factor baseline audit
We score the site against fifty technical SEO factors covering indexation, crawl efficiency, Core Web Vitals, schema markup, mobile, site architecture, canonical tags, sitemap health, robots configuration, security headers, and resource optimization. The output is a prioritized issue list ranked by revenue impact, not by ease of fix.
-
2
Continuous monitoring agent
We stand up automated checks that re-run inside 24 hours of any deploy and inside one hour of any indexation drop. A canonical-tag error that wipes 500 indexed pages gets flagged the day it happens, not in the next monthly report.
-
3
Sprint-paced remediation
Highest-revenue-impact issues get worked first. We ship fixes in two-week sprints, validate the fix is live, and confirm the indexation or Core Web Vitals delta before closing the ticket. No issues stay open in 'recommended but not implemented' status.
-
4
Schema implementation
Organization, Service, Article, FAQ, Product, Person, and BreadcrumbList schema get implemented as one job with cross-page consistency, not piecemeal recommendations the in-house team has to interpret. Schema correctness is validated against Google's structured-data testing tools every build.
-
5
Monthly technical health report
Every month you get a scored health report with delta from last month, top three risks, and the three actions we recommend prioritizing next. Reports are designed for engineering leadership, not just marketing.
Engagement Averages and Client Results
- ✓ Engagement-average 41% improvement in indexation health within 60 days
- ✓ Core Web Vitals LCP, INP, and CLS pass rate averages 92% within 90 days of remediation
- ✓ Crawl-budget reclamation typically frees 25 to 40% of Googlebot capacity for new content
- ✓ Canonical conflicts and parameter-handling fixes produce immediate indexation recovery, often inside 14 days
- ✓ Schema implementation lifts FAQ-rich-result eligibility on average 3.1x across remediated content
Engagement averages across comparable retainer engagements. Individual results vary by starting position, vertical, and execution cadence.
How OnyxRank compares to other technical SEO providers
Most technical SEO vendors are either audit-and-handoff agencies or self-serve software. OnyxRank is the rare model that pairs continuous monitoring tooling with a senior strategist who ships the fix.
| Vendor | Focus | Starting price | Why buyers choose them |
|---|---|---|---|
| OnyxRank (this site) | Continuous monitoring plus implementation, senior strategist included | $2,500/mo | 50-factor baseline plus monthly health report plus shipped fixes |
| Sitebulb | Self-serve technical SEO auditing software | $13.50/mo to $35/mo | Crawl-based audit reporting, no implementation |
| Screaming Frog SEO Spider | Desktop crawler and technical audit tool | Free to $259/yr | Industry-standard crawler, no managed service |
Frequently Asked
Questions buyers ask before they sign
How often do you actually audit, not just monitor?
Baseline audit on Day 1, continuous monitoring after that, and a full re-audit every quarter. Continuous monitoring catches what one-time audits miss; deploys and content changes break technical health constantly. A quarterly re-audit catches the slower-drifting issues that incremental monitoring is not designed to surface.
Can technical SEO work alone produce ranking lift, or do we also need content?
Technical SEO alone produces ranking lift on sites with strong content blocked by technical issues. On thin or undifferentiated content, technical work prevents loss but does not produce gain. Most engagements pair technical remediation with content work; the technical layer is the foundation that lets everything else compound.
Do you fix issues or just recommend?
We ship fixes. Our engagement model is implementation, not just audit-and-handoff. For schema, internal linking, sitemaps, robots configuration, and canonical handling, we make the changes ourselves on Pro and Enterprise plans. For platform-level changes that require your engineering team, we hand off implementation-ready specifications and validate the fix once shipped.
How is your technical SEO different from a tool like Screaming Frog or Sitebulb?
Tools surface issues. We pair tool output with a senior technical strategist who interprets priority, ships the fix, and validates the result. A tool finds 200 issues; the question is which 12 actually move revenue this quarter. That judgement is the deliverable.